Should the Government provide health care Essay

Should the Government provide health care - Essay ExampleThis implies that there needs to be a partnership between healthcare providers, fond workers and the organisation to undertake this effectively. In the end, the well-being of the public will bring about a positive impact on the economy as opportunities for insane asylum and productivity will be ensured. Strategies such as community oriented primary care are needed to address the upstream causes of social inequities in health and to foster intersectoral cooperation (van Weel et al 469). Therefore, one would say that it is the responsibility of the giving medication to be involved in the provision of health care to ensure availableness of health services to many, especially the poor, health care industry regulation, and to enhance fairness in the distribution of funds allocated to health care. It is essential to define the single-valued function that the organization should play in providing health care, as it is clear that this will be an advantageous step in ensuring citizens live healthily. It can be argued that the governments role in provision of health care primarily should be to ensure access in two ways availability and affordability. health care services are a right to every human being thus they should be at their reach and at a approach that is within their capability. However, the government should not overspend on the provision of health care at the expense of other issues such as education and infrastructure. The shell way to control this is by playing a preventive role where the significance of public programs becomes clear as they create awareness hence trim back costs that would be otherwise incurred on treatment (What should be the Governments role 20). Therefore, government health care is defined as require payments made to doctors, medical facilities and supplementary health care providers (White). Moreover, through the government taking a preventive as opposed to a reactive jell drives down costs, and this caps the contention on relevance of health care benefits to the poor who lack food shelter since health benefits are essential and indeed an income to the poor. Nevertheless, this debate is already countered by the fact that when measuring progress of a nation, the issue of accessibility to health care is considered alongside food, housing and other utilities. It has been suggested, that the poverty limen should be raised so that health benefits dont vault the poor over the line (Porter). In this case, health benefits would not merely be in terms of funds dispensed to the poor, but also information that makes them aware of costs that could be avoided through preventive measures. Moreover, it can be argued that the government should be involved in the provision of health care to ensure there is regulation and control. This advocates for the government to become concerned with optimizing costs that insurance companies put down in terms of add-on cos ts for example, processing claims and distributing insurance forms, which end up deterring people from seeking treatment in the event of illness. More importantly, the government should ensure that services offered are of good quality and equal to all in order to streamline the basic system in existence. This is an advantage because it improves